The premise is these wealthy folks (really, super, ultra wealthy) "give up" their life of luxury for ...wait for it... SIX WHOLE DAYS to go be poor. Of course we all know how the tug-at-your-heartstrings fairytale ends: the millionaires write a check to the poor people's charity, and hundreds of lives are made better because of it. On the surface, I get that. But here's the thing. What is the real purpose of this show? To bring awareness to struggling areas of our nation? I think that's how the press release would read. Let's be honest though. It's to make us tune in, cry a little, then feel warm and fuzzy watching the poor people receive their handout. And the ratings will soar, because Americans want to feel warm and fuzzy, and we want to feel like in the middle of financial crises, there's hope.
Here's my beef. You saw this coming. These "secret" millionaires are suddenly supposed to "know what it's like" to be destitute or impoverished after six days in a roach-infested apartment eating at soup kitchens? They have a finite glimpse into this window through the comfortable lens of their multi-million dollar eyes. They are going home in less than a week. I can think of few things more degrading, disrespectful, or condescending than to parade into someone's life of poverty, throw some pity money at them, and then fall back into your lap of luxury.
I could perhaps buy into this show if these millionaires made a permanent lifestyle change; if they sold some of their toys, rolled up their sleeves, and started implementing policies and programs that MATTER in people's lives. I really feel there needs to be a more even distribution of wealth in our country, although we all know it would be political suicide for anyone who attempted to legislate it.
I don't begrudge these folks their financial status for a minute. But when they step into the spotlight under these circumstances, then yes. Yes I do. They say this show will "remind us all that the greatest gift we can ever get is the chance to give." Also, "ABC will break down barriers, and close the gap between the haves and have-nots." Really? REALLY?? The chance to give $45K (on national television with all of America watching you) is really awesome. And when this show is over, and the gap has been "closed" for one week at a time, then what? What's the follow-up plan here? Who's going to stick around to empower these people once the donations run dry? Who's going to fight for social policy change that balances out this completely inequitable institutionalized poverty??
The racial component also eats at me. Here come the rich whites, into the poor black neighborhoods. One clip shows the millionaire white woman referring to two senior citizens, black women, as "seriously so cute" for the work they're doing with youth and music programs. Let's try some real adjectives, like "courageous" or "dedicated" or "selfless". But CUTE? I wanted to slap her.

Bottom line: I'm happy to see some deserving charities receive donations. I am disgusted at the feeling of exploitation that this show seems to exude. Do we need radical change in our social programs? Absolutely. Is this a 100% bad way to do it? I'll settle for 98.5% bad.
10 comments:
Hey Chica, distribution of wealth is good but you don't legislate it, let folks do it willingly. Let's have people provide for themselves. No one knows how to spend my money better then I do. So keep your grimy fingers away. Don't hate me.
So you won't be setting your DVR?
I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. I saw the show and I loved it! Yes, the millionaires aren't giving up much, but I think it is good for anyone to feel what it is like to be poor- even for just 6 days. I also think it is great to bring any light at all to the fact that there are people who are suffering right here in the good ole US. It is easy to forget as we live in our nice homes in nice neighborhoods. It may sound corny, but the show made me think about how I need to find more ways to volunteer in my community.
In the show, those two women were described as angels. In fact, someone said "Heaven is missing some angels, because we have them right here." They are amazing women.
Anyway. Just my take. I love having any feel good show on TV that I can watch with my kids. Certainly better than most of the crap on TV, right?
andrew- i don't even have a DVR.
shal... we agree to disagree. although i will concede you that it's better "tv" than most of the trash on there.
anna... you're such a republican, it amazes me how much i still love you.
Here's me being Switzerland....It is warm and fuzzy and something I can watch with my kids. BUT I would love to see more of a long term commitment to these people and not just a one time hand out while they can't a bunch of pats on the back for doing the right thing.
I read this post this morning and got called away from the computer...and it has been on my mind ever since.
I know I have a habit about making everything about me...but...the reason this post had such an impact is because I have been thinking about these issues because of my new ward boundaries. Basically, I agree with every single word you said...and my new situation has been very eye opening...I realized that when I went to, what one would consider, the more affluent ward we thought we ward members were service oriented and giving...now being in a ward that has many members living at or below poverty level has taught me what true service can mean...and it isn't always easy...but being selfless and serving is what the Savior would do. In that way I agree with all you said...true service is giving of one's self in the LONG term...not for a tv show...and it isn't always about money.
I am not making sense...I think I need to post about this or write you an e-mail.
I'm with Anna :) But I also think this whole concept of the show is retarded. I won't be watching it.
Let's all read a book, shall we?
You don't even own a dvr?!
Let me live in your shoes and maybe by the end of the week, I'll feel moved to purchase a DVRing system for you.
Watching this show is a little like shopping at Walmart. You know you're going to hate yourself a little bit for doing it, but here you are, buying cheap toiletries while you listen to the lady scream at her kids.
$100,000 to these people is like me getting a show for dumping a couple of dollar bills in the Salvation Army bucket at Christmas. Plus, with all the free publicity they are getting, they more than make up for their "sacrifice."
Or am I bitter because the first lady millionaire had a EE boob job and the camera guy couldn't get enough of it?
Post a Comment